Baker, Joseph Ellis. The Novel and the Oxford
Movement (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1932): 88-100.
Baker argues that Kingsley’s hostility to the Oxford Movement was based
on a quite different view concerning the nature of man. Whereas the
Oxford Movement held that man's nature was essentially sinful, Kingsley,
“of the school of Rousseau”, believed that it was essentially good (88).
Baker reviews the novels of this “pugnacious Protestant” for anti-Catholic
sentiments (99). “Though Kingsley’s pictures of Tractarians are so
obviously prejudiced that it is hardly necessary to correct them, his comments
help to reveal the core of his own vigorous mind, and the setting of the
Oxford Movement within the framework of other mid-century ideas” (100).
Oxford Movement
(Tractarianism); Novels;
Catholicism;
Religion.
Bertonneau, Thomas F. “Like Hypatia Before the
Mob: Desire, Resentment, and Sacrifice in The Bostonians (An Anthropoetics),”
Nineteenth-Century
Literature Vol. 53, No. 1 (June 1998): 56-90.
Bertonneau disagrees with the conventional contemporary reading of
the scene in Hypatia where Hypatia is murdered by a Christian mob.
Such reading is that the mob is a true representation of Christianity and
that Kingsley is castigating the hypocrisy and brutality of the new religion.
Rather, Bertonneau argues, just because the crowd thinks of itself as Christian
and acts in the name of this religion, it does not mean that it is in fact
truly Christian. “The truth, in Kingsley’s scene, is that the sacrificial
impulse comes not from Jesus (not from Christianity) but from the mob,
which is motivated by passion, not by compassion . . . . The mob
enacts the very impulse, namely sacrifice, that Jesus would suspend” (89).
Hypatia;
Catholicism;
History;
Henry
James.
Buckton, Oliver S. “'An Unnatural State’: Gender
‘Perversion,' and Newman’s Apologia Pro Vita Sua,” Victorian
Studies Vol. 35, No. 4 (Summer 1992): 359-383.
Buckton contends that Kingsley’s profound antipathy to Newman stemmed
from more than his belief in Newman’s dishonesty. Kingsley also disliked
Newman's embracing of Romanism and what he felt to be Newman's sexual ambiguity.
Moreover, Kingsley’s attitude, argues Buckton, represented opinions widespread
in Victorian society. “One is . . . justified in taking Kingsley’s
views on religious faith, sexual behavior, and gender roles (such as 'manliness')
as more broadly representative of mainstream British society, at
the time of their conflict, than were Newman’s” (379).
Newman Controversy;
Sexuality;
Catholicism.
Conacher, W. M. “Charles Kingsley,” Queen’s
Quarterly Vol. 45 (1938): 503-511.
Conacher presents a sketch of Kingsley’s life and works. He praises
the characterization in Hereward the Wake; it surpasses that of
Bulwer Lytton’s Harold and that of Scott’s Ivanhoe.
While he criticizes Kingsley’s anti-Catholic treatment in Westward Ho!
as being mere bigotry and not based on proper historical facts, he admires
the novel’s color and romance. Though Hypatia has matter for
a masterpiece, “haste, over-enthusiasm, and lack of artistry have spoiled
it” (509). Alton Locke is modern in its sympathy for the working
classes and its political views, while Yeast, though the work of
a young author, is praised for its “generous feeling” (510). Kingsley,
according to Conacher, “railed at John Bull in life and in letters and
was essentially in the end John Bull himself” (511).
Overview;
Novels;
Religion;
Catholicism.
Dawson, Carl. "Polemics: Charles Kingsley and Alton
Locke," in his Victorian Noon: English Literature in 1850 (Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979): 179-202.
Dawson provides an overview of Kingsley’s character, his social and
religious views, especially those on Roman Catholicism, and his involvement
in and his diverse attitudes towards socialism. He discusses Alton
Locke, “perhaps one of the oddest literary documents of nineteenth-century
England” (180), declaring that its recognition in modern times owes something
to Kingsley’s treatment being relevant to contemporary Marxist assessments
of literature. “Kingsley articulates the sense of waste in
his protagonist’s life; he equates Alton with the social upheavals of his
age, setting him against middle-class virtues and assumptions; and he creates
in Alton a psychic battle between social activism and pastoral escape”.
In addition, “Alton Locke could figure in the survey that
Georg Lukács, makes of the middling hero in nineteenth-century historical
fiction” (201).
Overview;
Social
and Political Views;
Religion; Catholicism;
Alton
Locke; Yeast.
DeLaura, David J. “The Context of Browning’s
Painter Poems: Aesthetics, Polemics, Historics,” PMLA Vol. 95, No.
3 (May 1980): 367-388.
DeLaura contends that the neo-Catholic art thesis of Alexis François
Rio as set forth in his 1836 De la poésie chrétienne
is essential for an adequate interpretation of Robert Browning’s painter
poems of the 1840s and 1850s. He also discusses how Kingsley was
earlier influenced by Rio’s work and argues that Kingsley’s artistic views
and his rejection of the Rio thesis constituted an important source for
Browning’s artistic ideas. He examines the passage in Yeast
where Kingsley has Barnakill present a Protestant view of art and a repudiation
of the Roman Catholic approach to art. He also discusses Kingsley’s
treatment in Alton Locke where he “uses the context of painting
to develop the more positive aspect of the new Protestant aesthetic of
realism” (377). Moreover, DeLaura, in his examination of Kingley’s
review of Jameson’s 1849 Sacred and Legendary Art, sees his antipathy
to Rio’s Catholic view of art to have a strong sexual basis. In this
work his “tone of intense leering and almost scurrilous derision . . .
is a measure of how deeply disturbing and threatening Kingsley found the
new ‘ascetic’ rewriting of art history” (377).
Browning; Art;
Catholicism;
Sexuality;
Yeast;
Alton
Locke.
Engelhardt, Carol Marie. “Victorian Masculinity and
the Virgin Mary,” in Andrew Bradstock, Sean Gill, Anne Hogan, and Sue Morgan
(eds.) Masculinity and Spirituality in Victorian Culture (Basingstoke,
U.K.: Macmillan, 2000): 44-57.
In this article Engelhardt considers how the understanding of the Virgin
Mary of three Victorian clergymen, Kingsley, Edward Pusey and Frederick
Faber, was related to their view of contemporary masculine identity and,
in particular, how each used the Virgin Mary to define his own masculinity.
Kingsley's dislike of Mary was, as Engelhardy points out, understandable
for one who hated Catholicism. However, she also relates his antipathy
to the power that Catholics ascribe to Mary. Kingsley shared the
common Victorian view of the domesticity of women and that it was the role
of females to inspire men but that they themselves should not aspire to
power. Engelhardt also contends that Kingsley's hostile attitude
to Mary was related to fears about his own masculinity. Early in
his life Kingsley himself had felt a pull towards Catholicism, a
religion he later came to view as female-oriented and therefore unmanly.
"It was no wonder, then, that Kingsley felt compelled to reject vociferously
the most feminine part of this allegedly effeminate religion. Kingsley
was not just denouncing Mary; he was repudiating what he considered to
be his own weakness and error in desiring Rome" (47).
Virgin Mary;
Manliness;
Catholicism;
Yeast.
Fichter, Joseph H., S. J. “The Socialism of a
Protestant: Charles Kingsley (1819-1875)” in his Roots of Change
(New York: Appleton-Century, 1939): 134-156.
Fichter reviews Kingsley’s life and principal works focusing on his
social and political thought. He is balanced in his assessment, pointing
out a number of Kingsley’s faults, prejudices, and illogicalities in addition
to his good qualities. With respect to Kingsley’s changing views
and specifically to his title of Christian Socialist, Fichter declares
that “he was no more thoroughgoing Socialist than he was thoroughgoing
Christian” (135). Fichter briefly reviews Kingsley’s condition of
England novels declaring Alton Locke to be “a tremendously effective
book” (151) and the autobiographical Yeast to be badly marred by
Kingsley’s intense anti-Catholic bigotry. Fichter concludes that
“the work of Charles Kingsley was on the whole a genuine contribution to
the improvement of man’s relation with man. His mistakes were the
mistakes of every demagogue to tread the earth, but the hand he had in
rousing social interest in English problems more than made up for them”
(156).
Overview;
Christian
Socialism; Social and Political
Views; Catholicism; Alton
Locke; Yeast.
FitzPatrick, P. J. “Newman and Kingsley,” in David
Nicholls and Fergus Kerr, OP (eds.) John Henry Newman: Reason, Rhetoric
and Romanticism (UK: The Bristol Press, 1991): 88-108.
FitzPatrick discusses Kingsley's charges against Newman and the latter's
replies to them. He considers that the charges were more substantial
than generally believed and that Newman's responses revealed "an uneasiness
over evidence" and a certain looseness with veracity.
Newman
Controversy; Catholicism.
FitzPatrick, P. J. “Newman’s Apologia:
Was Kingsley Right?,” in T. R. Wright, John Henry Newman: A Man for
Our Time? (Newcastle: Grevatt and Grevatt, 1983): 28-36.
FitzPatrick analyzes the Kingsley-Newman controversy and particularly
the charges laid by Kingsley against Newman’s veracity and Newman’s responses
to them. He contends that while Kingsley was unsubtle and perhaps
unbalanced, his charges were substantive and ones Newman found difficult
to answer. “. . . time and again, Newman’s replies are inadequate;
and [Kingsley] did point, however imperfectly, to deficiencies in Newman’s
ways of thinking” (28).
Newman Controversy;
Catholicism.
Griffin, John R. “Kingsley’s Attack on Newman:
An Essay in Social History,” Faith & Reason Vol. 4 (1978): 17-27.
Griffin dismisses two common interpretations for Kingsley’s attack
on Newman, first, that he was a bluff, enthusiastic, John Bull type of
Protestant, totally lacking in malice, and two, that he did not believe
that Newman was a liar but, rather, that he was guilty of unnatural attitudes
towards marriage and sex. On the contrary, Kingsley was indeed motivated
by a belief that Newman lied. Moreover, Griffin points to evidence
from newspapers, journals, and books and from views of individuals in Kingsley’s
own circle, for example Maurice and Froude, that this was a common long-standing
belief in England. Participating in this belief, “Kingsley’s failing
was neither intellectual nor sexual: it was moral, the fault of judging
others” (24).
Newman Controversy;
Catholicism.
Houghton, Walter E. “The Issue Between Kingsley
and Newman,” Theology Today Vol. IV (April 1947): 81-101.
Houghton argues that the fundamental disagreement between Kingsley
and Newman was the fundamental dichotomy between Protestant Liberalism
and Christian Orthodoxy. Though in many respects Kingsley was a conservative
and a public enemy of those espousing the liberal cause, in religion he
followed the liberalism of the likes of Maurice and Carlyle. While
we read such thinkers to understand liberal ideology, argues Houghton,
we study Kingsley to comprehend Protestant Liberalism in its actual practice.
Catholicism;
Newman
Controversy; Newman, John Henry; Religion;
Protestant
Liberalism.
Jay, Elizabeth. Faith and Doubt in Victorian
Britain (Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan, 1986).
Jay briefly discusses Kingsley’s dislike of Roman Catholicism and Tractarianism.
Catholicism;
Oxford
Movement (Tractarianism).
Kijinski, John L. “Charles Kingsley's Yeast:
Brotherhood and the Condition of England,” VIJ: Victorians Institute
Journal Vol. 13 (1985): 97-109.
In his analysis of the novel Yeast Kijinski declares that the
novel despite its "bland didacticism" is very representative of the period,
the hungry forties. He argues that the novel also provides a strong
insight into a commonly held ideological stance of the time, namely that
the growing antipathy between the haves and the have-nots might be improved
without force, unions, redistribution of wealth if only all social classes
acted sympathetically and humanely in the true belief that everyone is
a member of the same common family.
Yeast; Social
and Political Novel;
Social
and Political Views;
Catholicism.
Litvack, Leon B. “Callista, Martyrdom,
and the Early Christian Novel in the Victorian Age,” Nineteenth-Century
Contexts Vol. 17, No. 2 (1993): 159-173.
A primary goal of Hypatia, or, New Foes with an Old Face, according
to Litvack, was to question deeply held Roman Catholic principles and views
of history of such as Newman and Wiseman, authors themselves of martyrological
historical novels Callista (1855) and Fabiola (1854) respectively.
Kingsley throughout Hypatia, written in the early days of his growing
antagonism to Newman, disparages aspects of the Patristic age and especially
the 5th century when Christianity was the state religion. By depicting
the 5th century Church as corrupt and tyrannical, Kingsley was attacking
the contemporary English Roman Catholic Church which was rapidly growing
in influence. “Kingsley enjoins his readers to look to themselves
for justification – not to the past, in which he finds little support for
his faith” (165).
Hypatia;
Catholicism;
Newman;
History.
Loesberg, Jonathan. Fictions of Consciousness:
Mill, Newman, and the Reading of Victorian Prose (New Brunswick: Rutgers
University Press, 1986).
Loesberg discusses the origin and development of the Kingsley-Newman
controversy. He contends that Newman essentially “slyly” baited Kingsley
into making the precise criticism that was the most appropriate for Newman
to reply to. It was not a simple matter of an innocent Newman replying
to a strong bigoted attack. “Still, he did no more than put Kingsley in
a position in which Kingsley already felt comfortable. Newman’s effort
was not really to occupy the firmest ground he could, but simply the most
pertinent. Kingsley’s original accusation was the most easily refutable
but also the least resonant. To make his defense polemical, his autobiography
an expression of his philosophy, Newman needed to confront the issues of
consistency and honesty. To bring the issues to the forefront, he
did no more than nudge Kingsley in the direction of making clear what he
had already implied in the original libel” (131).
Newman Controversy;
Catholicism.
Morris, Kevin L. “John Bull and the Scarlet Woman:
Charles Kingsley and Anti-Catholicism in Victorian Literature,”
Recusant
History Vol. 23, No. 2 (October 1996): 190-218.
Morris provides a thorough analysis of Kingsley's often virulent anti-Catholicism,
discussing it in the context of other widespread contemporary anti-Catholic
writings and sentiments held by many of the age's prominent intellectuals
and writers. Morris also considers Newman's critique of anti-Catholic "Kingsleyism"
especially as expressed in his Lectures on the Present Position of Catholics
in England.
Catholicism;
Newman.
Newsome. David. Godliness and Good Learning:
Four Studies on a Victorian Ideal (London: Cassell, 1961).
Mention of Kingsley occurs frequently in Newsome’s work. Newsome
is particularly interested in Kingsley’s notion of manliness which he views
as being very similar to the robustness, feistiness and vigorous vitality
of thumos, as opposed to the higher excellence of arete,
equated by Coleridge with manliness. Newsome also stresses that Kingsley,
the first to combine manliness with godliness, considered manliness to
be “an antidote to the poison of effeminacy – the most insidious weapon
of the Tractarians – which was sapping the vitality of the Anglican Church”
(207). Manliness for Kingsley was using to the full all the qualities
with which God has endowed men, including the sexual function. That
is why Roman Catholicism’s celibacy provided strong evidence of that religion’s
lack of manliness and its consequent falling away from appropriate godliness.
Manliness; Muscular
Christianity; Sexuality; Celibacy;
Catholicism.
Schiefelbein, Michael.
“'Blighted' by a 'Upas-Shadow': Catholicism’s Function for Kingsley in
Westward
Ho!,” Victorian Newsletter Vol. 94 (Fall 1998): 10-17.
Schiefelbein examines Kingsley's severe characterizations
of Catholics in Westward Ho!, especially two of his keenest bete
noires, Catholics' worship of the Virgin Mary and Catholicism's embrace
of asceticism and condemnation of the flesh. Kingsley, advocate of
muscular Christianity and espouser of manliness, detested what he considered
to be effeminate "Mariolatry" which was responsible for weakness and womanishness
in society. He also condemned the asceticism of the Jesuits Parsons
and Campion which he held to be an unnatural rejection of God-given impulses.
They were "spiritual grotesques" (15). However, Schiefelbein also
argues that Kingsley reveals his own ascetic impulses and his attraction
to monkish ways in Westward Ho! and reconciles the opposite pulls
of asceticism and carnal and sexual nature. Schiefelbein concludes
that while "one may certainly object to the role Kingsley assigns to Catholicism
. . . it becomes an effective foil for enlightening his readers - and,
very likely, for reminding himself - of the dangers of Manicheanism" (16).
Westward Ho!;
Religion;
Catholicism;
Virgin
Mary; Muscular Christianity;
Sexuality;
Manliness.
Trevor, Meriol. Newman: Light in Winter
(London: Macmillan, 1962).
Trevor examines the Kingsley-Newman controversy paying particular attention
to Kingsley’s motives in instigating his attack. He considers that
Kingsley’s dislike of Newman stemmed from the early attraction Newman had
for his wife Fanny who intended to join Pusey’s sisterhood. Kingsley
had to win back his wife and depose Newman’s “authoritative image” (327).
Newman was quite unaware that to Kingsley there was a particularly personal
reason for linking virility with truth and cunning with virginity.
For Newman signified to Kingsley, who abhorred Catholic celibacy and the
notion of women choosing virginity, “a powerful father-figure withholding
desirable brides from ardent lovers by the mental bondage of the ideal
of celibacy”. This sexual connotation, according to Trevor, “explains
the passionate hatred evident on every page of the pamphlet in which he
set out to settle the score of twenty years” (328). Trevor also discusses
the reaction of the reviews and the periodicals to the controversy.
Newman Controversy;
Catholicism;
Sexuality;
Celibacy;
Reception
of Kingsley's Works.
Uffelman, Larry K. “Kingsley’s Hereward the
Wake: From Serial to Book,” Victorians Institute Journal Vol.
14 (1986): 147-156.
Kingsley, according to Uffelman, very carefully revised the text of
his last novel in its original serial form for its publication as a book.
Published first in the Protestant journal Good Words, Hereward displays
throughout Kingsley’s hatred for effete, feminine monasticism and by extension
Roman Catholicism. However, Uffelman shows that Kingsley as he made
revisions for publishing the novel in book form toned down some of his
more venomous passages “tempering his story to fit a different medium and
to appeal to the taste of a more liberal publisher," Macmillan (155).
Hereward
the Wake; Macmillan's; Catholicism;
Publication.
Uffelman, Larry K., and P. G. Scott, “Kingsley's
Serial Novels: Yeast,” Victorian Periodicals Newsletter Vol.
IX, No. 4 (December 1976): 111-119.
Uffelman and Scott discuss the early publication history of Yeast
which first appeared anonymously in six monthly installments in Fraser’s
Magazine from July to December 1848 and which was later republished
in volume format in 1851. They pay particular attention to the revisions
Kingsley made in the volume text. In addition to tempering many phrases
which might have upset orthodox religious sensibilities, Kingsley also
added much anti-Catholic material in the 1851 book, especially in the sub-plot
concerning Luke, the Tractarian curate and Lancelot’s cousin. The
other major revision involved expanding the ‘discussion’ element in the
last part of the novel where Lancelot meets the prophet Barnakill.
This tilts “the balance of the novel towards the question of religious
belief” ( 117). With respect to the diverse revisions Uffelman and
Scott declare that “The new and topical sub-plot devoted to Luke’s conversion
to Catholicism made the novel more abstract and theological, as did also
the expanded conversation with the prophet in the last chapter. The
minor revisions, however, suggest an interesting slight softening in Kingsley’s
attitudes to more orthodox religious earnestness, and show also that Kingsley
himself had become aware of some of the unevenness of plot and tone which
serial composition had encouraged in his first novel” (118-119).
Yeast; Catholicism;
Religion;
Publication.
Williams, Stanley. "'Yeast': A Victorian Heresy,"
North
American Review Vol. 212 (November 1920): 697-704.
Williams discusses Yeast, paying particular attention to the
novel’s characterization and such themes as antipathy to Roman Catholicism
and the espousal of Christian Socialism. Though he discerns distinct
problems with the novel, for example its lack of genus, he praises its
pervasive sincerity and Kingsley’s palpable ardor as well as its presentation
of important Victorian disputes and movements. While students of
Victorian literature will readily discern the problems of this “potpourri”,
“they will understand the Victorians better, and so think their reading
worth while” (704).
Yeast; Catholicism;
Christian
Socialism.
Wolff, Robert Lee. Gains and Losses: Novels
of Faith and Doubt in Victorian England (New York and London: Garland,
1977).
Wolff praises Hypatia’s “vivid and engaging prose style”, its
historical authenticity, the depiction of Hypatia, and its readability.
He writes that Kingsley had two main intentions in writing the novel. He
was criticizing Transcendentalism, held by Emerson and others, wishing
“to illustrate the dangers of the intellectual arrogance which falsely
persuaded individual human beings that they could seek and find their own
deity, ignoring the Church and religious tradition” (274). Also,
suspicious of the intellect and believing that the only path to faith was
through emotional commitment, Kingsley was attacking the Tractarians and
converts like Newman whom he held were “groping in the dead past for outworn
dogmas and practices” (275).
Hypatia;
Emerson;
Transcendentalism;
Catholicism;
Celibacy.
Young, G. M. “Sophist and Swashbuckler,” in Daylight
and Champaign: Essays (London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1948; first published
1937): 96-104.
Young discusses Kingsley’s controversy with Newman. Agreeing
that Kingsley was no match for the brilliance of Newman and that he was
totally out-manoeuvered, Young nevertheless contends that Kingsley in an
admittedly “clumsy way” had a certain right. “But if the public,
or the modern reader, said ‘Never mind all that: what we want to know is,
when Dr. Newman or one of his pupils tells us a thing, can we believe it
as we should believe it if the old-fashioned parson said it?’ I am afraid
the upshot of the Apologia and its appendices is No” (103).
Newman Controversy;
Catholicism.
Zemka, Sue. Victorian Testaments:
The Bible, Christology, and Literary Authority in Early-Nineteenth-Century
British Culture (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997).
Zemka discusses Kingsley's 1849 review of Anna
Jameson's Sacred and Legendary Art, the first of her four-part study
of medieval and Renaissance European art. It was a laudatory review and
though Kingsley displays his customary antipathy to Catholicism he agrees
with Jameson's view that English Protestant culture's best defense against
the incursions of Catholicism "is a cautious appropriation of Catholic
culture's superior sense of the beautiful" (106).
Art;
Catholicism. |