Banton, Michael. “Kingsley’s Racial Philosophy,”
Theology Vol. LXXVIII, No. 655 (Jan., 1975): 22-30.
In this short examination of Kingsley's views on race Banton warns of the
danger of presentism, that is interpreting these views in terms of the perspective
and context of a later period. Some of Kingsley's writings, declares
Banton, have been considered with a presentism interpretation and he himself
"has at times been categorized as a racist by authors who reflect very little
before applying this highly elastic contemporary category to people living
in a period when the understanding of the biological nature of man was very
different" (22).
Racial
Prejudices ; Presentism
; Darwin
; Evolution
.
Beer, Gillian. Darwin's Plots: Evolutionary
Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction (London:
Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983).
Beer considers Kingsley's debt to Darwin and the evolutionary theories in
his works, particularly The Water-Babies. The latter novel, Beer
points out, echoes how Darwin's natural order reflects such features of Victorian
society as division of labor, competition, and family structures. Kingsley
also follows to a certain degree Darwin's challenge to Malthusian theories.
Like Darwin, Kingsley disputes Malthus by regarding profusion and hyper-productivity
as good and in his account of the evolutionary process of the once excluded
Tom he challenges Malthusian social theory. "In its unguarded and unanalytic
response to Darwin's ideas and rhetoric, Kingsley's work represents the first
phase of assimilation. He grasped much of what was fresh in Darwin's
ideas while at the same time retaining a creationist view of experience"
(138).
Darwin ;
Evolution
; Malthus
; The
Water-Babies .
Hawley, John C., S. J. "Charles Kingsley
and the Book of Nature," Anglican and Episcopal History Vol. 61, No.
4 (December 1991): 461-479.
Hawley examines Kingsley as natural theologian and his views on the “meaning”
of nature. He discusses Kingsley’s attempt to bridge the ever widening
gap between the claims of science and religion and to establish a vocabulary
that would be intelligible to and supportive of both fields. In this
respect he provides a comparison of Kingsley’s views on the theological beliefs
of and the search for meaning in Arnold, Huxley, and Darwin. Kingsley’s
aim, according to Hawley, “was to circumvent fears and cynicism, and to move
his readers into a world of scientific endeavor and Christian cooperation.
In choosing the commitment of faith over strict empiricism he became for
many, in an age of increasing dichotomy between the realms of science and
religion, a model of a Christian who hoped that the truths of both would
ultimately coalesce” (479).
Nature ;
Science
; Religion
; Natural
Theology ; Arnold,
Matthew ; Huxley ;
Darwin
.
Henkin, Leo J. Darwinism in the English
Novel 1860-1910: The Impact of Evolution on Victorian Fiction (New York:
Russell & Russell, 1963).
For Kingsley the Bible and science were compatible. He welcomed Darwin’s
theories which rendered Nature and all about him more full of divine significance
than ever before. While Kingsley reverenced Nature, “he reverenced
more the will that is above Nature. His reverence for Nature was not
antagonistic, but paid homage to his faith in the supernatural” (146).
Science ;
Religion
; Darwin
; Nature
.
Johnston, Arthur. "The Water-Babies
: Kingsley's Debt to Darwin,” English Vol. 12 (Autumn 1959): 215-19.
Johnston reviews the scientific content in a number of Kingsley’s works, in
particular the novels Yeast, Alton Locke, and Two Years Ago
. He considers that the influence of Darwinian thought and the theory
of evolution is particularly evident throughout The Water-Babies.
In fact, “The metamorphosis of Tom into a water-baby is not more wonderful
than the metamorphosis of the Origin of Species into The Water-Babies
” (219).
Science ;
Darwin
; The
Water-Babies .
Levy, David M., and Sandra J. Peart. “Charles
Kingsley and the Theological Interpretation of Natural Selection.” Journal
of Bioeconomics 8 (2006): 197-218.
Authors’ Synopsis: “This paper questions the common view that Darwinian biology
is a straightforward extension of classical political economy. Our analysis
contrasts the economists’ classification scheme—whereby all humans were presumed
natural kinds, to be equally competent for economic and political decision
making—with the post-Darwinian classification scheme that developed. When
the tools of political economy were imported into biology, the presumption
of homogeneity of competence was denied. Charles Kingsley played a significant
role in the transition from one sort of classificatory scheme to another,
in the overthrow of the economists’ notion that humans are the same in their
capacity for trade and moral judgment. Darwin sent Kingsley a presentation
copy of Origin of Species and quoted him in the second edition as
the ‘celebrated author and divine’ who had sketched a theology in which Providence
used natural selection in the creation process. The economists’ doctrine
that all people form a natural kind had many opponents. Biologists agreed
with economists that, whatever differences existed between races of people,
none put a person outside the protection of law. Other opponents, e.g., Thomas
Carlyle, criticized both the economists’ premise and their conclusion
regarding protection under the law. Kingsley moved from a Carlylean to a
Darwinian opposition to natural kinds.”
Economics;
Natural
Selection; Darwin.
Meadows, A. J. “Kingsley’s Attitude to
Science,” Theology Vol. LXXVIII, No. 655 (January 1975): 15-22.
Meadows declares that Kingsley was unlike many of his religious contemporaries
in his belief that science and even the theories of Darwin actually strengthened
the truths of Christianity. He also states that Kingsley viewed science as
a vehicle for improving society, for example the promotion of public health.
In addition, Meadows writes that Kingsley though an enthusiastic practitioner
of science was still an amateur in a field that was quickly becoming professional.
Science ;
Religion
; Darwin
; Health
.
Rauch, Alan. "The Tailor Transformed: Charles
Kingsley's Alton Locke and the Notion of Change," Studies in the
Novel Vol. 25, No. 2 (Summer 1993): 196-213.
Rauch considers Kingsley's belief that science and religion are compatible
and that the study of the former could only serve to support the teachings
of faith. Both are truth seeking activities. Kingsley also found
suggestive the parallels between transformations in the natural worlds and
transformations in the spiritual spheres. It is a parallel, declares Rauch,
that Kingsley adapted for the character of Alton in Alton Locke.
Kingsley is drawing on the progressive transformation of forms in the natural
world when he depicts the gradual change of Alton from an atheist and political
agitator to a Christian with a much moderated political reform agenda.
Science ;
Religion
; Change,
Notion of ; Darwin ;
Alton Locke
; Social
and Political Views .
Stevenson, Lionel. “Darwin and the Novel," Nineteenth-Century
Fiction Vol. 15, No. 1 (June 1960): 29-38.
Stevenson argues that while The Origin of Species had a stunning impact
on its publication in 1859, educated people had been well prepared for it
by a variety of influences in the early 1850s. He quotes, for example, from
some of Kingsley’s novels, arguing that Kingsley was a firm advocate of developmental
progress.
Darwin
|