BOSTON
COLLEGE |
|
Electronic Mail: frcasey@bc.edu
Carney 214 - Tel . 23854
Philosophy of the Person I and II
Spring 2002
April 9 - Reminder about paper on moraity of sexual conduct: No more than 5 pages, double space. Topic: Choose either premarital sex or homosexual acts or the relation of marriage as a basic human good with the morality of sexual conduct. 1) State the issue 2) Give different positions 3) Grisez's position (apply criterion of morality, the first principle of morality, the modes of responsibility) 4) Evaluation: personal assessment of Grisez's positio.
NEXT FEW CLASSES
April 9- 16 Morality of Sexual Conduct
April 11 - Debate
April 18 - Review of Chaps. 11- 13 - Paper due.
April 23 - Quiz on Chaps. 11 - 13 And Abortion
March 26 - Prayerful best wishes for this sacred season.
The debate may, hopefully, have made you aware of just what makes any act
morally good or bad, what constitutes morality. When we return I
shall report another attempt of Grisez to explain, to identify this precise
point. Then we shall apply his ethics to some contemporary neuralgic
issues. Should prove to be challenging.
March 11 - Welcome back. I hope you enjoyed and profited from
the Spring vacation.
Schedule for next few classess: March 12 - Review Modes 1-7, start Mode
8. March 14 - Mode 8 ; Prelect Chap. 13; Introduce Consequentialism
March 19 - Chap. 13 March 21 - Consequentialism
March 26 - Debate on Consequentialism.
Assignments: Paper on the 8 Modes due March 21. Content: for each mode give Meaning, Justification, Evaluation
Paper on Morality of Sexual Conduct due after we review Chaps. 11-13.
Topics: A choice of one of the following: Permarital sex or Homosexual
acts or Relatiion of Marriaage as a basic human good with the morality
of sexual conduct.
Content: 1)State the problem 2) Give different positions (See Mappes
and Zembaty in Readings) 3) Grisez's position (See Readings)
4) Evaluation: personal assessment of Grisez's position.
Feb. 7 - Question Periods: Thurs. Feb. 14 3 p.m. Carney
307 Fri. Feb. 15 1 p.m. Carney
009
3 p.m. Carney 206
Tues. Feb. 19. 3 p.m. Carney 305.
Next Tues. we shall try to finish Ques. 94. Perhaps on
Thurs. we shall review BNM.
Those continuing course: BNM:-Study Aids Chap. 1,
p.7,Primary Ques... #1 Chap. 2, p. 17, Ques...Arise,
#s 8,9
Chaps. 3,4 p. 25,#2,3 Chap. 6,pp. 32-3
#s 1,2,3,4,5; p. 38-39,#VI Chap. 7,pp.
50-1,#s 3,4,5,8
Chap. 9,pp. 52-3, #s 2,3,6,7,8
Dec. 11 - This is the time to assimilate Grisez's ethics. I wish you all well. - Question Periods today at 4 p.m. and Thurs. at 2 and at 4 p.m. (Today in Carney 103 - Thurs. in Carney 305). Papers and rewrites may be picked up at the Question Periods or outside Carney 214. Do well in the exams and have a happy and holy Christmas or/and holidays.
Nov. 15 - Question periods on Monday will be at 2 and at 3 p.m. in Cushing 208.
Nov. 13 - Repeating: Quiz Tues. Nov. 20. Question periods: Tues. and Thurs. of this week at 3 p.m. in Carney 010. Change: Instead of Friday, the Question period(s) will be on Mon. Nov. 19.
MATERIAL FOR QUIZ:
BNM,
Chap. 2 Study Aids p. 16, #s 1-6
Page 17 Questions as Arise, #s 6 & 8
P. 19, I, 3,b,c,d and 4. P. 20 Introd.- Link with Chap.
2 P.20 "Dualism and New Morrality," the quote.
P. 21, Link with Chap. 2 P. 22, Introd. paragrs.
1-4
P. 23, "Playing for Time." P. 23 "Moral Objectivity"
#s 1-6
Chap. 6 Study Aids Page 32, Chap. 6, #s 1-5
P. 33, Further Questions, #s 8,14,15, 17 Pages 34-39 #s III,
IV, VI.
SCHEDULE OF REMAINING
CLASSES (which we shall try to follow):
Nov. 13
- Chap. 2, Chap. 7 (Rewrites due.) Alert: Paper on Chaps.
7-9.
Nov. 15
- Chap. 7. Start Chap. 8
Nov. 20 - Quiz - Chap. 8 (Study Aids Pages 54-58 - 7th Plank)
Nov.
27 - Chap. 9
Nov. 29 - Chap. 9 (Study Aids p. 58 on - 8th Plank)
Dec.
4 - Study Aids Pages 68 on
Dec. 6 - Debate - Also Readings page 125, Natural Law and Moral
Inquiry
Nov. 8 - Quiz on Tues., Nov. 20. Question periods in preparation
on next Tues., Thurs. and Friday.
Tues. we start the core of Grisez's ethics: Chaps. 7-9. Check Studay
Aids for strategy .
Nov. 1 - Note well that Tues. we shall debate moral relativism and start Chap. 2. Check the syllabus which refers to a quiz and to Chaps. 7-9.
Oct. 30 -Tues. Schedule for next few classes: Chap. 6 - SA 42-45
Prelect Chap. 2
Thurs. Quiz Kreeft Interviews 2,3,9
Tues. Nov. 6 Debate and Chap.2 (Recommend Spitzer
44-49)
Oct. 25 - Quiz One - Nov. 1. Question periods: Oct. 25 - 3 p.m.__ Oct. 26 - 11 a.m. and 2 p.m _ Oct. 30 - 3 p.m.
Material for Quiz:
(Thomas Aquinas included) Study Aids p. 7, Chap. 1 - Primary Questions
#1. A and B
pp. 7-8 Questions as Arise # 1, B, #3. #5 amd A
Kinds of Acts #3
Fulfillment in Christ Definition of free choice: p. 12
(2nd col.) paragr. 2 and p. 13 (1st col.) paragr. 2
How free choice arises: p. 12 (2nd col.) paragr. 3-5
Choice and external behavior: p.13 (1st col.) paragr. 5; p.14 (2nd col.)
paragr. 2,3
Choices last: p.13 (2nd col.) paragr. 2,3
Proof: p.10 (1st col.) paragr. 4
Aristotle Study Aids, p. 105 Book III # 1,2 (How does Aristotle go about defining "voluntary act.")
Thomas Aquinas Study Aids p. 105 Ques. 82 #1,2,3 Ques. 83 #1
Oct. 11 - Today was one of the excitiing classes I've experienced for
a long time. One student wanted to expand the issue of free choice
to God's forevision so that everything seemed predetermined. Another
questioned the Square of Opposition and contradictories. A third
challenged the entire approach to free choice, since everything is material
and whatever we think or choose is related to our chemistry. There
are answers to all these challenges. But I normally do not have to
address them. Thank you to these students. Makes teaching come
alive.
Tuesday we shall address the kinds of actions we perform. Then Aristotle
and Thomas Aquinas on freedom. Soon the debate: either Oct. 18 or
Oct. 23.
Oct. 4 We shall continue on the 3 Interviews in Kreeft and begin Chap. 1. Once again a reminder that the paper on happiness is due Oct. 9. Note the penalty for being late.
Sept. 27 A reminder that the paper on happiness is due Oct. 9. Question periods are provided as mentioned in class. - Monday we shall finish Chap. 4 and do Study Aids p. 25. We shall also do Spitzer, the selected pages beginning with 65. Thursday we should treat BNM's Introduction and Kreeft: Interviews 1,4,10. A primary objective is to discuss what philosophy is.
Sept. 20 A reminder that you should be working on your paper about happiness. See date due and content expected in Syllabus. - We shall finish Book II and cover Book X rapidly. Then do Beyond the New Morality , Chaps. 3-4. It would be advantageous also to read Spitzer on happiness. See pages assigned in Syllabus.
Sept. 13 The groups should be settled. After some background on
Aristotle we shall delve into his Nicomachean Ethics. Taking Socrates'
challenge seriously that "an unexamined life is not worth living,"
Aristotle will try to apply theoretical thinking to the challenge.
He will claim that there is one ultimate good all aim at and that is happiness.
But people disagree on what constitutes happiness. He believes he
can discover what true happiness consists in by identifying the characteristic
activity of human beings. If they perform that action according to
virtue ("arete") they will be fulfilled .
We shall do Book I and move on to do Bk II on Tuesday.
Sept. 6 Well, we have started well. But it must be clear
how necessary it is to come prepared if the discussion groups are to prove
fruitful. Once drop/add is over and the class is stabilized we shall try
to balance the groups in number and gender. If you have any particular
preference for a group, let me know. Those groups will be permanent.
Please come to Tues. class having read the Apology and studied it in the
light of the Study Aids. I especially hope you will have checked
the positions Socrates takes in his "real apology." This part is
the richest part and the most challenging part for your lives. For example,
do you really accept the first three points he makes in the real apology?
And the 4th?
I have to make
clear from the beginning just what the objective of this course is.
Philosophy
of the Person is a core course and so you are being introduced to a new
field of knowledge. As in any introductory ccourse there are at least two
ways of proceeding. For example in Physics, a professor might take the
position that few students will pursue Physics as a major and so opt to
have the class learn a bit of the history of the science or some of the
benefits civilization has reaped from the science. On the other hand he
might take the position that students could profit from actually doing
physics and so he teaches basic ideas of the science and has the class
laboratory experiments.
In philosophy
a professor may well take the position that he/she will expose the students
to some of the great philosophers and treat the course more or less as
a history of philosophy.
I take the
position that students could profit from doing philosophy. I shall
introduce you to a few great philosophers this semester, Plato, Aristotle
and Thomas Aquinas, but in relation to getting you to do philosophy.
I want you to learn to philosophize. In the second semester
we shall do one of Descartes's works, return to Thomas Aquinas and touch
upon Heidegger and Kierkegaard.
Now there
are many divisions or branches of philosopy - theory of knowledge, epistemology,
metaphysics, natural theology, cosmology and ethics. Since only two semesters
are provided, we cannot cover all these branches. I believe the field closest
to your lived experience is ethics - for everyone has been making ethical
or moral decisions for years. You already have an ethics. You know what
is right and wrong. You are trained to know and to do what is right and
to know and avoid what is wrong. But at some point in your life you undoubtedly
became very challenged on the views you have been trained in. And you faced
the decision to embrace what you had been trained in, to reject all that
or to modfy those values.
How does one
go about making such a decision? By docile trust in your parents
and teachers? By rebellion and by following peer pressure or media
pressure? This course will offer you a reflective grasp
of ethics which can empower you to make that decision intelligently and
responsibly.
In order to
equip you with the insights, principles and method which empower you to
make an intelligent and responsible decision we shall focus on Germain
Grisez's Beyond the New Morallity. Grisez
is one of the outstanding ethicians living and writing today. In
my judgment he may prove to be one of the greatest minds of the 20th century.
To explain
one approach to ethics will prove to be difficult and so there are costs
to this way of teaching the Philosophy of the Person. We simply will
not have time to expose you to a variety of ethical approaches. We
shall confront relativism and proportionalism, but not at great length.
Besides, getting you to do philosophy, do philosophical ethical
thinking limits time for dealing with the history of philosohy.
Personally
I am convinced you will profit more by learning to do philsophy
and to have the opportunity to reflect upon your moral values than by a
cursory acquaintance with a number of great philosophers.
Lest you find
yourself disappointed, it is important you understand from the beginning
what the objective of this course is.
Doing philosohy
in the first semester will consist of learning the basic ideas and fundamental
principles and method. In the second semester we shall fill out these
basic ideas and then truly get into the laboratory by testing these ideas,
applying them to very important and pertinent issues, like assisted suicide,
abortion, sexual conduct. The primary objective in studying
these issues will be to test how well you understand the ethics we have
studied. But obviously you will also clarify your judgment about
the issues. You may, in fact, discover that you cannot accept the
ethics if you find yourself convinced that it is wrong in its application.
But you should then be able to identify what in the ethics you must deny
or reject.
I believe this
course can be stimulating, enlightening and personally helpful. It
should be clear that you cannot in two semesters have the experience of
doing
philosophy and reading a lot of philosophers.
Classes will
involve lecturing and discussions. Daily the class in small groups
will engage in discussing the material being covered.
Teaching Assistants acting as facilitators will make this possible.
To be estalished: Takingall
this as established, in the second semester we will follow Grisez as
he expands this criterion and the first principle of morality into 8 modes
of responsibility, guidelines for moral evaluation of our actions, and
addresses the problem of ambiguous action (cc.11-13). After treating the
moral obligation of social duties, he outlines the way to incoporate into
our lives this approach to happy, fulfilling moral living, taking account
of moral education, the proper understanding of progress, social reform,
the role of religion and the structuring of one's commitments. To test our understanding of Grisez's
ethics we shall study how it applies to contemporary pertinent moral issues:
assisted suicide, abortion, sexual conduct. In addition
we shall peek into Descartes, Discourse on Method;
Heidgger, Memorial Address on Thinking , Thomas
Aquinas on the Natural Law, and sections of Kierkegaard.
ACADEMIC BACKGROUND AB, Boston College, Ph L, Weston College,
STL, Weston College, PH D, Gregorian Univ., Rome, Post graduate studies
at Harvred Univ, New Yor Univ. Yale Univ.
Recent publication: God Is: From Question
to Proof, to Embracing the Truth Work in process: Morality of Life
and Sex Issues.
that
we possess freedom of self-determmnation (cc. 1-2);
that
to be happy consists in being complete as a person;
that
to be complete one must leave him/herself as open as possible to the fullest
range of human goods, must make and live out harmonious and morally good
commitments (cc. 3-4);
that
to be a person is to be both individual and social and to so need community
for fulfillment that everyone belongs to many different societies and,
as a result, has a number of different roles (c.5);
that
since relativism is false, there must be objective moral standards (c.6);
that
happy and complete living coincides with moral living ; and
that
the criterion of moral goodness is inclusivistic choosing (choosing in
a completely reasonable way) and that the first principle of morality is
"In voluntarily acting for human goods and avoiding what is opposed to
them, a person should choose and otherwise will those possibilities, and
only those, which it is compatible with integral human fulfilment to will"
(cc.7-9)
Ambitioned: Intellectual Presuppositions
for Generation X.