SC 715: Classical Social Theory
Department of Sociology Theory Proseminar I
Fall 2001
ONeill 255
Monday 3:00-5:30
Syllabus
Section
B
Section
C
Section
D1, D2
Section E
Section F
Section G1, G2
Section H1, H2
Section I
Section J
Section K
Section L
Section M
Other sections will appear as the semester progresses.
Section A
Theory, Methodology, and Research as a Vocation
Central Theoretical Issues in Sociological Theory
Theoretical Problematic of Western Social Theory
Theory may be defined as the
intellectual formulation of relationships. As such, theory
may be formal or informal, verified (tested) or unverified
(tentative). Sociological theory is the formulation of relationships
stated in terms of a sociological perspective, that is,
having to do with how people behave and think in interaction
with other people. Sociological theory is also scientific
in at least some minimal sense or, if one wishes, academic.
This means that it is the statement of social relationships
in the context of an explicit elaboration of the hypothesized
relationships and an explicit statement of the data and
arguments that support the case for the theory. My view
of sociological theory, then, is the explicit elaboration
of relationships about behavior and belief in society in
a manner open to replication (verification) or falsification
by others.
This section of the course introduces a series of considerations
on the meaning and content of sociological theory with the
purpose of your formulating your own tentative understanding
of the nature of sociological theory and the issues entailed
in defining it.
I will begin by summarizing my views on the definition of
theory and sociological theory, the central theoretical
issues of sociological theory, and the theoretical problematic
of Western social theory. Theory, Methodology, and Research
as a Vocation Research is the process of obtaining insight
into how and why the social world works, that is, the discovery
of knowledge. The two central tasks in the discovery of
knowledge are (1) the formulation and verification of theory
and (2) doing so in a systematic way. The first task is
that of theory formation; the second task is that of methodology.
Research is not about theory; and it is not about methodology.
It is about the confluence of the two tasks, as the term
"discovery of knowledge" denotes. The theoretical
task always entails methodology; the methodological task
always revolves around the quest for knowledge. Thus research
as the discovery of knowledge is an unending vocation.
From infancy, if not from the womb, we are all at every
moment informally carrying out research. Formal research,
carries out the discovery of knowledge in an explicit way.
Exploring a range of the explicit practices of the discovery
of knowledge is, at least for me, the goal of this course.
In our first meeting I hope to accomplish three objectives:
(1) set out my understanding of theory and theory formation
as the central tasks of social science; (2) indicate a broad
understanding of the nature and usefulness of methodology;
and (3) suggest the kinds of dispositions surrounding research
as a vocation.
Theory may be defined as the intellectual formulation of
relationships. As such, theory may be formal or informal,
verified (tested) or unverified (hypothetical and tentative).
Social theory is the discovery of relationships having to
do with how people think, feel, and behave as they engage
in the social processes of socialization and social construction.
Formal discovery of knowledge is often spoken of as "scientific"
or "academic." In my view, these are fortunate,
terms. They emphasize an effort to explain social relationships
by means of an explicit elaboration of the hypothesized
relationships, an explicit statement of the data and arguments
that support the case for the theory, and an explicit set
of procedures that are open to being reproduced by others.
The root notion of scientia I translate as skillfully obtained
knowledge. My view of social theory, then is the explicit
elaboration and provisional verification of relationships
about behavior, sentiment, and belief in a methodologically
explicit manner, that is open to replication (verification)
or falsification by others.
This section of the course introduces a series of considerations
on the meaning and content of sociological theory with the
purpose of your formulating your own tentative understanding
of the nature of social theory and social science methodology
and the issues entailed in defining it.
During the class meeting I will summarize my views on the
process of theory formation, the meaning of the social science
perspective, the process of theory formation in sociology,
and how to make sense out of the following array of nominally
distinct working definitions of the theoretical enterprise
in social science:
(1) detailed conceptual elaboration either with or without
a corresponding theory;
(2) inductive substantive theories using anecdotal, historical,
or observational data to explain how and why certain social
phenomena occur;
(3) deductive substantive theories using systematically
organized survey data to test, verify, and recast theories
specified in the form of hypotheses and propositions;
(4) systematic expositions on the development and nature
of sociological theory using existing theories as their
data and striving to formulate a more comprehensive or critical
theory;
(5) analytical efforts at a higher level of abstraction
attempting to explicate the fundamental aspects of consciousness
and behavior in society; and
(6) philosophical reflections on the epistemological issues
of knowing and truth as it applies both to interpreting
the meaning of culture and meaning, on the one hand, and
to understanding the stance in regard to truth of the investigator.
It should be noted that few, if any, theoretical writings
can be categorized neatly into one of these categories;
most, in fact, combine two or more of these six notions
of theory. Throughout the course we will examine writings
in each of these categories and will accept them as relevant
for a course in sociological theory.
Theoretical writings also may be distinguished by their
fundamental epistemological stance, the major questions
they attempt to answer, the unit of analysis they deem most
basic, the social relationships or institutions claimed
to set the character of society, their central concepts,
and overall organizing perspective or logic of analysis.
As we cover the material of the course, be particularly
aware of how each theorist treats each of these issues.The
central recommended reading for this section are from sections
of Bernard Lonergans Insight from Robert K. Merton's
chapters on sociological theory in his book, On Theoretical
Sociology. Lonergan provides the most useful understanding
of understanding, as he puts it, I have come across. Merton
provides one relatively early definition of sociological
theory along with a number of distinctions that remain important
today. In contrast to many writings on theory and method,
Merton's work appears uncomplicated and, to some, less sophisticated.
It does serve the purpose, however, of introducing the central
issues as I see them as well as presenting some of the key
pieces of an important contemporary theorist.
Recommended Reading:
Heilbron, Johan. The Rise of Social Theory. Polity
Press: Oxford. 1995
Connell, R. W. "Why is Classical Theory Classical?"
AJS, Vol. 102, No. 6 (May 1997): 1511-57.
Collins, Randall. "A Sociological Guilt Trip: Comment
on Connell." AJS, Vol. 102, No. 6 (May 1997):
1558-64.
Levine, Donald. "Social Theory as a Vocation: Engaging
with Future Challenges." Perspectives. The ASA Theory
Section Newsletter. Vol. 19, No. 2. Summer 1997. Included
in newsletter are four responses to Levine.
Robert K. Merton. On Theoretical Sociology. Chapters
II, IV, V.
George Ritzer. "The Current Status of Sociological
Theory: The New Synthesis." Chapter 1. George Ritzer
(Ed.). Frontiers of Social Theory: The New Synthesis.
Columbia University Press. New York. 1990.
Anthony Giddens, Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory.
University of California Press. Berkeley: 1982. Especially,
"Classical Social Theory and the Origins of Modern
Sociology." Pp. 40-67.
Anthony Giddens, Capitalism and Modern Social Theory.
An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber.
Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1971.
Agger, Ben. Socio(onto)logy. University of Illinois
Press. Urbana. 1989.
-Chapters 1 and 2.
Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. The Discovery
of Grounded Theory. Aldine Press. Chicago: 1967.
Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. Basics of Qualitative
Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Sage: Newbury Park, California. 1990.
Walter L. Wallace (Ed.). Sociological Theory. Aldine.
Chicago. 1969.
-Preface and Part I.
Novick, Peter. That Noble Dream: "The Objectivity
Question" and the American Historical Profession.
Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 1988. -Introduction-Chapters
13, 14, 15
Liberson, Stanley. "Einstein, Renoir, and Greeley:
Some Thoughts about Evidence in Sociology." 1991 Presidential
Address to the American Sociological Association. ASR,
1992, Vol 57 (February: 1-15).
Ted Benton. Philosophical Foundations of The Three Sociologies.
Routledge & Kegan Paul. Boston: 1977.
Anthony Giddens. "Positivism and Its Critics."
Pp.237-286 in Tom Bottomore and Robert Nisbet, (Eds.) A
History of Sociological Analysis. Basic Books. New York:
1978.
Anthony Giddens. New Rules of Sociological Method.
Basic Books. New York: 1976.
Anthony Giddens. "Positivism and Its Critics."
Pp.237-286 in Tom Bottomore and Robert Nisbet (Eds.), A
History of Sociological Analysis. Basic Books. New York:
1978.
Russell Keat and John Urry. Social Theory as Science.
Routledge & Kegan Paul. Boston: 1975. Parts I, II
Bernard J. F. Lonergan, S.J. Insight: A Study of Human
Understanding. Philosophical Library. New York: 1957.
Preface, Introduction, Chapters I, II, III, IX
Murphy, John W. Postmodern Social Analysis and Criticism.
Greenwood Press. New York. 1989. Chapters 1, 2, 3.