|
|
|
Research
The Efficiency of the Global Market for Productive Capabilities
Despite integration of financial and goods markets, borders still impose considerable
friction on the flow of goods. This paper quantifies these frictions by estimating
the cost that borders impose on international flows of capital goods. It constructs a
novel measure of the real exchange rate and estimates the border cost directly from
nonlinearities in the real exchange rate process. During the sample period, 1974 to
2007, a relocation reduces the quantity of the relocated capital good by 35% for the
median country pair. A transfer of consumption goods entails a loss of only 15%. This
difference holds even after accounting for within-country costs, and indicates that border
frictions in markets for capital goods are substantially higher than in markets for
consumption goods.
On the Correlation Structure of Microstructure Noise in Theory and Practice
(with F. Diebold)
We argue for incorporating the financial economics of market microstructure into
the financial econometrics of asset return volatility estimation. In particular, we use
market microstructure theory to derive the cross-correlation function between latent returns
and market microstructure noise, which feature prominently in the recent volatility
literature. The cross-correlation at zero displacement is typically negative, and
cross-correlations at nonzero displacements are positive and decay geometrically. If
market makers are sufficiently risk averse, however, the cross-correlation pattern is
inverted. Our results are useful for assessing the validity of the frequently-assumed
independence of latent price and microstructure noise, for explaining observed crosscorrelation
patterns, for predicting as-yet undiscovered patterns, and for making informed
conjectures as to improved volatility estimation methods.
Multivariate Comparisons of Predictive Accuracy
(with J. Christensen, F. Diebold and G. Rudebusch)
We propose a generalized Diebold-Mariano (DM) test of equal accuracy of a set of
forecasts. The need for such a test arises in a variety of applications, but the existing
DM literature is silent on the issue. Our approach makes only minimal assumptions on
models and loss functions; it is therefore very flexible and applicable in many situations.
« Back
|
|