This course asks you to imagine social deviance as noise— a cacophony of subversions disrupting the harmony of a given social order. Social control is the opposite. It labors to silence the resistive sounds of deviance. It endeavors to transform the noisy challenge of difference into the music of conformity. Social control is what gives a social order its power. When effective, social control ritually reduces, expels, or constrains what is "other" to the dominant organization of power within a specific historical period.
In framing the study of deviance and social control as a contest between those with sufficient power to construct and enforce some versions of social reality to the exclusion of "others," this course invites you to engage analytically in a story at the core of sociology itself. How do various societies construct boundaries between what is normatively acceptable and what is condemned as deviant? In what ways are such boundaries both resisted and changed? What are the material and imaginary effects of constructing boundaries in certain ways but not others? How is the production of normative boundaries related to the reproduction and/or deconstruction of various forms of social hierarchy, particularly to the sex/gender, race/ethnic, and economic hierarchies so prevalent in the society in which we live and study? To explore such questions is to attend to the complex and often contradictory social processes by which some ways of behaving, thinking, and feeling are made to appear as good, or even "natural," while others are made to seem evil, sleazy, dirty, dangerous, sick, immoral, crazy, or just plain "deviant." An analytic engagement with such questions is a core feature of this core course.
A central objective of this course is to critically examine a particularly important aspect of the relationship between deviance and social control: the historical construction of different theoretical perspectives on deviance. Such perspectives guide the ways we both think about and act toward deviance. Throughout history a wide array of religious authorities, legal experts, philosophers, politicians, police, therapists, activists, and social scientists have produced a variety of perspectives on these matters. To examine such perspectives from a sociological viewpoint involves the production of analytic stories about the telling of other stories—historical and sociological stories about the invention and practical implications of various ways of making sense deviance. Throughout this course we shall examine the dominant theoretical imagery, methodological strategies, and social control policies associated with nine perspectives which have captured the theoretical imagination of western society at various points in history. These perspectives have also often been used as justifications by the west for defending against and/or subordinating its nonwestern "others."
All theoretical stories of deviance are told from historically
specific standpoints. They embody the perspectives of particular authors
within politically charged social contexts. The theoretical narratives
you will be asked to read and those you will be asked to write are no exception.
In studying the social contexts in which theories about deviance are produced
and consumed, you will also be asked to imaginatively reflect upon the
ways in which your own biographical and historical positionings affect
the ways you understand deviance and social control. This is to introduce
you to a "power-reflexive" method of analysis. As a sociological strategy,
a "power-reflexive" demands that we as researchers attempt to rigorously
situate the always "partial" perspectives by which our own quests for knowledge
are both facilitated and limited by our relations to power. In approaching
the study of deviance from a "power-reflexive" viewpoint, this course seeks
to clarify the socio-historical conditions in which influential ideas about
nonconformity arise. It is also aimed at providing a critical grasp of
the ways in which theoretical constructions of deviance and social control
influence the economic, sex/gendered, and race/ethnic character of continuing
struggles for justice in history.
Course Outline/Assigned Readings
Topic One: Control and Resistance: the theory and practice of deviance.
This section introduces students to key aspects of sociological theory
and methods, providing the conceptual foundations for analytic approaches
used throughout the course. Deviance and social control are here conceived
as ritual social practices, material and imaginary "dramatizations" of
ever-changing historical relationships between knowledge and power.
1. Stephen Pfohl, Images of Deviance and Social Control: a sociological history, 2nd Ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994, pp. 1-16, 401-417.
2. Patricia Williams, The Alchemy of Race and Rights: diary of a law professor, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991, pp. 3-14.
Topic Two: Supernatural Controls and Sacred Transgressions.
This section examines the rise of Judaic-Christian perspectives on deviance as "sin" and the implications of this distinctive religious viewpoint for a sociological understanding of culture, sexuality, gender, and spirituality.
Topic Three: Social Control in the Age of Reason: "the (white) Rights of Man".
This section examines the sociological development of eighteenth century legal theories of deviance as "rational hedonism" and nineteenth century notions of nonconformity as sickness. In critically examining these perspectives, each is compared with modern pornographic worldviews that arise at essentially the same time. In what ways does pornography represent something like a relatively unacknowledged shadow of classical rationality and the positivist methods associated with medicalized perspectives on deviance? What are the implications of such shadows for the modern organization of sex/gender, racial and economic institutions?
A. Cool Man Calculating: the classical perspective.
B. Deviance as Sickness: medicalized positivism and pornography.
Topic Four: Sociological Surveillance: pleasure of the scientific gaze.
This section provides a critical introduction to the concepts, methods, and the historical context of perspectives dominating the sociological imagination of deviance from the years following World War I until the 1950s. Particular attention will be paid to economic, gendered, and multicultural dimensions of both deviance and social control.
A. The Disorganization Perspective: social realism and sociological surrealism
B. Functionalism and Cybernetics: Deviance as Adjustive Feedback.
C. Lost in Desire: the Anomie Perspective
Topic Five: Constructing the Normalized Subject of Deviance
This section provides an overview of two perspectives focusing on the role of mundane social interaction in shaping both the development of deviant behaviors and the labeling of deviance. Both perspectives were particularly influential in the 1960s and 1970s. (*The readings from Images of Deviance and Social Control for this section are relevant to the "historical autobiographies" assignment and should be read during the first month of this course.)
A. Normalizing Relations: the learning perspective
B. Questioning Normalizing Strategies: the problem of societal reaction
Topic Six: Power-Reflexive Reconfigurations of Deviance and Social Control
This section concludes the course with a discussion of a variety of convergence critical viewpoints. Of particular concern are the contributions of feminism, Marxism, anarchism, anti-racist, and poststructuralist critiques of hierarchical orderings of power and knowledge.
This is a core course in sociology. It is also cross-listed as a course
in Women's Studies. Its aim is to introduce students to the sociological
study of the theories, methods, and policy implications of various approaches
to the social control of deviance in history. Toward this end, the course
has three major individual writing projects—two essay exams and a "historical
autobiography." A fourth assignment—the group ethnographic project—also
includes a writing component. A detailed explanation of each of the following
assignments will be provided to each student during the course of the semester.